Trump vowed to end forever wars. He’s just approved one—without the order or the truth. The strike is scripted. The applause is queued. The consequences will be global. This is not restraint. It’s spectacle with a body count.
I read China opposes any acts that violate the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter, and violate other countries' sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity. will the escalation of the situation in the Middle East cause the US conflict with China?
That’s an important point. China’s official position emphasizes sovereignty and non-intervention, but it also serves its strategic interests—namely, casting the U.S. as the global aggressor. If the Israel–Iran conflict draws in American military power, and that power is used without international consensus or congressional authorization, it hands Beijing a diplomatic weapon. Not because they oppose escalation in principle—but because they benefit from framing it as Western hypocrisy. A direct U.S. conflict with China over the Middle East is unlikely—but the propaganda war is already underway.
And meanwhile, down here in the Antipodes, we prostrate ourselves before Uncle Sam, our Defence Minister & Deputy Prime Minister Marles essentially giving away our sovereignty in offering our continent as a giant aircraft carrier. Hegseth rattles his Sabre at the 'imminent' Chinese threat and we just get on board, pathetically, dangerously. We continue, too, to spout mealy-mouthed words about the mass murder in Gaza/West Bank, and now Iran, always declaring 'Israel has the right to defend itself'. Australia, the gutless country.
Thank you for this. What you’re describing—Australia’s strategic subordination—isn’t unique, but it’s particularly stark right now. The danger isn’t just the loss of sovereignty; it’s the loss of clarity. When a nation aligns itself so reflexively with American military ambitions, it begins to inherit the same moral evasions: euphemisms for war crimes, selective outrage, and the normalization of permanent conflict. The phrase “right to defend itself” has become a kind of theological incantation—uttered without context, without proportionality, and increasingly without credibility. What’s needed isn’t just independence of policy, but independence of thought.
Thank you for your research Donny. It is true that the immorality of cruelty and greed has been re-exposed in modern times. Mass murder and land theft is not new. It has been the primary source of wealth transfer in the history of expansionism. It has been achieved through passive complicity and active cooperation and will continue until only the oligarchical few remain. Useful idiots, despite quietly kept promises, will not be spared.
I may be cynical. I believe that England, US, etc., “created” Israel after WWII because there is Biblical prophecy starting the “End of Days” with Jews returning to the Holy Land. Then there has to be a war there, and some Christian sects have absolutely longed for Israel’s war that will trigger the Rapture, Glorious Returning, and their (the believers’) reign with Jesus over the New Heaven and New Earth. I believe it is why Huckabee was so thrilled to be ambassador to Israel.
Christian nationalists tend to also be Zionists. They don’t necessitate support Israel because they agree with them as much as because they believe they have to keep Israel in existence to create the conditions necessary for their religious prophecies to come to fruition. 😐
You’re not wrong to trace the overlap between Christian nationalism and apocalyptic Zionism. For some, support for Israel isn’t about shared values or democratic alignment—it’s about staging prophecy. And yes, there are political figures who appear more animated by eschatology than diplomacy. What gets lost in all of this is the reality on the ground: the human cost, the rule of law, and the steady erosion of accountability under the cover of divine inevitability. Whatever one’s theology, it should never be used as a justification for permanent war or as a blueprint for foreign policy. That’s not prophecy. That’s abdication.
Well said. If a prophecy requires geopolitical manipulation, endless war, and civilian bloodshed to come true, then it’s not a prophecy—it’s a policy agenda wrapped in scripture. The danger isn’t belief. It’s the insistence that belief must be enacted, at scale, through violence. Any god who needs war to prove his authority has already surrendered it.
No. The Puppet Masters — Not Trump — rule the world. Wage these wars ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️. What is wrong with you ????? Rothschild clan owns the Fed, the Vatican , all major US corporations. Via their owned vanguard and blackrock corporations. Look at who owns all major corps people : see who is at the top of the list of shareholders. Yes. Blackrock. Vanguard State Street. We are controlled by them. They own mass media. Big Pharma. Foods — every food you eat. This author is reporting FAKE NEWS
It’s easy to point to shadowy cabals when the truth feels unbearable—but conspiratorial thinking tends to blur complexity, not clarify it. Yes, corporate concentration of power is a real and troubling issue. Yes, firms like BlackRock and Vanguard hold enormous financial influence. But the leap from economic leverage to global mind control isn’t analysis—it’s paranoia dressed as insight.
This essay is grounded in verifiable events: troop movements, public statements, official approvals. Not theories. Not speculation. If you want to challenge the facts, I’m open to it. But invoking the Rothschilds and Vatican without evidence only distracts from the real dangers we face—dangers that don’t need to hide in the shadows, because they’re unfolding in plain sight.
Thank you for your comments. I don’t engage in personal attacks, nor do I trade in conspiracy or abstraction. What I publish is grounded in verified reporting, military records, and official statements—sources anyone can examine. If you disagree with my interpretation of the facts, that’s welcome. If you’re accusing me of being “worse than evil,” or part of a secret matrix, you’re not having a conversation. You’re chasing ghosts.
The issues I write about are deadly serious. They deserve clarity, not noise. When you’re ready to discuss ideas with decorum like an adult—not fantasies—I’m here. ✌️
OK—what’s not going to happen is this: you’re not going to spam my comment section, hurl wild accusations, and dress it up as debate. A difference of opinion is fine. Accusing me of being evil or deceptive is not. If you want to engage with ideas, facts, and evidence, I welcome it. If you choose to escalate further, you’ll be banned. This space is for serious conversation—not projection and paranoia.
I read China opposes any acts that violate the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter, and violate other countries' sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity. will the escalation of the situation in the Middle East cause the US conflict with China?
That’s an important point. China’s official position emphasizes sovereignty and non-intervention, but it also serves its strategic interests—namely, casting the U.S. as the global aggressor. If the Israel–Iran conflict draws in American military power, and that power is used without international consensus or congressional authorization, it hands Beijing a diplomatic weapon. Not because they oppose escalation in principle—but because they benefit from framing it as Western hypocrisy. A direct U.S. conflict with China over the Middle East is unlikely—but the propaganda war is already underway.
And meanwhile, down here in the Antipodes, we prostrate ourselves before Uncle Sam, our Defence Minister & Deputy Prime Minister Marles essentially giving away our sovereignty in offering our continent as a giant aircraft carrier. Hegseth rattles his Sabre at the 'imminent' Chinese threat and we just get on board, pathetically, dangerously. We continue, too, to spout mealy-mouthed words about the mass murder in Gaza/West Bank, and now Iran, always declaring 'Israel has the right to defend itself'. Australia, the gutless country.
Thank you for this. What you’re describing—Australia’s strategic subordination—isn’t unique, but it’s particularly stark right now. The danger isn’t just the loss of sovereignty; it’s the loss of clarity. When a nation aligns itself so reflexively with American military ambitions, it begins to inherit the same moral evasions: euphemisms for war crimes, selective outrage, and the normalization of permanent conflict. The phrase “right to defend itself” has become a kind of theological incantation—uttered without context, without proportionality, and increasingly without credibility. What’s needed isn’t just independence of policy, but independence of thought.
Thank you for your research Donny. It is true that the immorality of cruelty and greed has been re-exposed in modern times. Mass murder and land theft is not new. It has been the primary source of wealth transfer in the history of expansionism. It has been achieved through passive complicity and active cooperation and will continue until only the oligarchical few remain. Useful idiots, despite quietly kept promises, will not be spared.
China and Russia... Both will do nothing.... Wanna bet?
I may be cynical. I believe that England, US, etc., “created” Israel after WWII because there is Biblical prophecy starting the “End of Days” with Jews returning to the Holy Land. Then there has to be a war there, and some Christian sects have absolutely longed for Israel’s war that will trigger the Rapture, Glorious Returning, and their (the believers’) reign with Jesus over the New Heaven and New Earth. I believe it is why Huckabee was so thrilled to be ambassador to Israel.
Christian nationalists tend to also be Zionists. They don’t necessitate support Israel because they agree with them as much as because they believe they have to keep Israel in existence to create the conditions necessary for their religious prophecies to come to fruition. 😐
You’re not wrong to trace the overlap between Christian nationalism and apocalyptic Zionism. For some, support for Israel isn’t about shared values or democratic alignment—it’s about staging prophecy. And yes, there are political figures who appear more animated by eschatology than diplomacy. What gets lost in all of this is the reality on the ground: the human cost, the rule of law, and the steady erosion of accountability under the cover of divine inevitability. Whatever one’s theology, it should never be used as a justification for permanent war or as a blueprint for foreign policy. That’s not prophecy. That’s abdication.
I argue that if their God is so powerless they need to make his prophecies come true, he might not be worth worshipping. 😐
Well said. If a prophecy requires geopolitical manipulation, endless war, and civilian bloodshed to come true, then it’s not a prophecy—it’s a policy agenda wrapped in scripture. The danger isn’t belief. It’s the insistence that belief must be enacted, at scale, through violence. Any god who needs war to prove his authority has already surrendered it.
He’s everyone’s useful idiot.
Indeed. 🤙
No. The Puppet Masters — Not Trump — rule the world. Wage these wars ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️. What is wrong with you ????? Rothschild clan owns the Fed, the Vatican , all major US corporations. Via their owned vanguard and blackrock corporations. Look at who owns all major corps people : see who is at the top of the list of shareholders. Yes. Blackrock. Vanguard State Street. We are controlled by them. They own mass media. Big Pharma. Foods — every food you eat. This author is reporting FAKE NEWS
It’s easy to point to shadowy cabals when the truth feels unbearable—but conspiratorial thinking tends to blur complexity, not clarify it. Yes, corporate concentration of power is a real and troubling issue. Yes, firms like BlackRock and Vanguard hold enormous financial influence. But the leap from economic leverage to global mind control isn’t analysis—it’s paranoia dressed as insight.
This essay is grounded in verifiable events: troop movements, public statements, official approvals. Not theories. Not speculation. If you want to challenge the facts, I’m open to it. But invoking the Rothschilds and Vatican without evidence only distracts from the real dangers we face—dangers that don’t need to hide in the shadows, because they’re unfolding in plain sight.
Why don’t you find out who owns those corporations and how many, who is behind them before lambasting truth. ????
Where are your sources to defend your claims???
They are embedded in the text of the essay. If you see that a word or a phrase is underlined, it is hyperlinked to a source.
And I have evidence DOnny. You’re an evil wicked disgusting person.
Who. Are you ??? What. Are. Your. Credentials ?????
Liar 🤥
Wow—a lot to unpack here.
Thank you for your comments. I don’t engage in personal attacks, nor do I trade in conspiracy or abstraction. What I publish is grounded in verified reporting, military records, and official statements—sources anyone can examine. If you disagree with my interpretation of the facts, that’s welcome. If you’re accusing me of being “worse than evil,” or part of a secret matrix, you’re not having a conversation. You’re chasing ghosts.
The issues I write about are deadly serious. They deserve clarity, not noise. When you’re ready to discuss ideas with decorum like an adult—not fantasies—I’m here. ✌️
Your ad hominem fallacious reasoning needs examination. Read. My comments
OK—what’s not going to happen is this: you’re not going to spam my comment section, hurl wild accusations, and dress it up as debate. A difference of opinion is fine. Accusing me of being evil or deceptive is not. If you want to engage with ideas, facts, and evidence, I welcome it. If you choose to escalate further, you’ll be banned. This space is for serious conversation—not projection and paranoia.
Calm the fuck down.